Wednesday, December 25, 2019

Classification and Division Essay Roommates - 799 Words

Essay: Classification or Division. Class: Eng 110. Instructor: Mrs. Anna Forbes. ------------------------------------------------- â€Å"Roommates† Reza Hossaini How different we are! We deal with different people. These people can be our neighbors, class fellows, our friends or they can be our roommates. If I speak about my roommates, first I will categorize them into different groups. However roommates include people or students who come from different places, provinces or even from different countries so in this case they are categorized into various divisions. Generally in my point of view, roommates are classified into three diverse sorts in terms of their behavior, ethic or morality, merit and as bellow; The first kind includes the†¦show more content†¦Roommates in this kind are reliable, sometimes joking, not too much speaking, and a little bit serious. They don’t like to joke too much or if you joke with them, they will get serious soon. They are irascible in joking so you always cannot be kidding with them. As I said, interestingly, in our dormitory the only room which has different kinds of roommates is our room. It is such that other students call our room as â€Å"room of diversity†. It’s the name that they ascribed to us because we have almost all categories of roommates from different provinces with various nationalities. For instance, Sebqatulla one of my roommates is from Herat. Due to having some described characteristics of this class, he fits in the second category. He is serious when we speak to him with a serious tone and he is witty and joking when we do so. In a single word he, adjusts and fits himself in the any environment he locates. Another kind of roommates is conservative roommates. They are so careful about their relations with other people and students. Especially they care how to behave with their roommates. Roommates who include in this category are conservative and much cautious in terms of how to get relation and how his or her other roommates should behave with them. In our room I may go to this category of roommates. I am not that good a joker and get serious soon that is why my roommates don’t joke much with me. Once my roommateShow MoreRelatedChapter 6 – Analyzing Business Markets23838 Words   |  96 Pagesâ€Å"all those individuals and groups who participate in the purchasing decision-making process, who share some common goals and the risks arising from the decisions.† a. buying center (moderate) p. 106 b. initiating team c. purchasing division d. engineering division e. influencing center 48. In the buying center, __________ are people who request that something be purchased, including users or others. a. initiators (moderate) p. 106 b. influencers c. deciders d. approvers e. gatekeepers Read MoreProject Managment Case Studies214937 Words   |  860 PagesPROJECT MANAGEMENT CASE STUDIES, SECOND EDITION - PROJECT MANAGEMENT CASE STUDIES, SECOND EDITION HAROLD KERZNER, Ph.D. Division of Business Administration Baldwin-Wallace College Berea, Ohio John Wiley Sons, Inc. This book is printed on acid-free paper. @ Copyright O 2006 by John Wiley Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored inRead MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 PagesMultitasking Step 2: Establishing Project Priorities 106 Step 3: Creating the Work Breakdown Structure 108 Major Groupings Found in a WBS 108 How WBS Helps the Project Manager 109 WBS Development 109 34 A Portfolio Management System Classification of the Project Financial Criteria 37 Nonfinancial Criteria 39 36 36 Applying a Selection Model 42 Sources and Solicitation of Project Proposals 43 Ranking Proposals and Selection of Projects 44 Step 4: Integrating the WBS with the OrganizationRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesbecome more difficult to compete for major contracts. Moreover, although SSS Software’s revenue and net income continue to grow, the rate of growth declined during the last fiscal year. SSS Software’s 250 employees are divided into several operating divisions with employees at four levels: Nonmanagement, Technical/Professional, Managerial, and Executive. Nonmanagement employees take care of the clerical and facilities support functions. The Technical/Professional staff performs the core technical work

Monday, December 16, 2019

Thomas Grays Eligy Indited in a Country Churchyard

Thomas Gray indited a poem that compares to other poems on prodigious levels of kindred attribute, with some differences. The structure of â€Å"Elegy Indited in a Country Churchyard† is homogeneous to the four line stanzas of other poetry encountered throughout this semester. Gray utilizes a homogeneous theme of time in his poem, likewise in Shakespeare’s sonnets and Donne’s â€Å"The Ecstasy†. Gray’s purport of imagery differs drastically from other poets. To commence, structure is the first thing to descry while comparing Gray’s â€Å"Elegy† to other poems. Gray indites in heroic quatrains, four line stanzas with an iambic pentameter. Iambic pentameter is the designation given to a line of verse that consists of five iambs. Iambs being one†¦show more content†¦Shakespeare seems absorbed in physical resplendency when reading Sonnet Nineteen. His aperture line, â€Å"Devouring time†¦Ã¢â‚¬  time is eating up all of eart h’s creatures. All of the resplendency is eaten up by time. Gray utilizes the theme of time by imaging what the mundane man of this country churchyard did during their life. Instead of being upset about time passing, glomming resplendency within the world, and not capitalizing on the time given to us, Gray is appreciating the time the deceased has had. â€Å"For them no more the blazing hearth shall burn, / or diligent housewife ply her evening care: / no children run to lisp their sire’s return, / or climb his knees the envied kiss to apportion.† Here, Gray is reminiscing the times a certain man might return home and appreciating the affection of his family. Other poets might visually perceive time as an exasperation; Gray optically discerns it as a treasure to be cherished. When comparing Gray’s â€Å"Elegy† to John Milton’s â€Å"Lyciads†, we discover a drastic difference. Both men indited in replication to a death of their friend. Gray’s poem reflected mental conceptions of the past lives of the mundane people found within the country churchyard. He is asking us to accolade the lives of the people he has discovered in this graveyard. Gray develops relationships between these dead and nature. In stanza seven, â€Å"Oft did the harvest to their sickle yield, / Their furrow oft the obdurate glebe has broke;

Sunday, December 8, 2019

Our Daily Bread Sliced Thin Essay Example For Students

Our Daily Bread Sliced Thin Essay King Vidor’s 1934 film Our Daily Bread is aptly named, for the film is of a prayer than an actual solution to the Great Depression. Like other Socio-political films of the era, it tries to offer a solution to the problems faced by so many Americans. However, Vidor’s message gets lost somewhere between the poor production, the bad acting, and the inconsistent ideology of the film. For those reasons what comes out at the end is an almost silly climax with little realism that offers the same amount of help that an escapist vehicle of the same period would offer. Vidor’s vision first began with his 1928 classic film of a couple being subjugated by the big city, The Crowd, which is the first part of a series of films Vidor wanted to do that depicted the lives of average American men and women (Vidor 221). The film follows the protagonist, John, as he slaves away in his office doing paperwork like so many other insignificant men. When John leaves work he is still just going through the motions, for his courtship and marriage to the heroine of the film, Mary, seems like a part of the city routine. Their marriage is enclosed by the city that their marriage suffers until Mary becomes pregnant. Here Vidor makes his point with his images of births in quantity (Bergman 76). John’s downfall in the film begins with the death of his child. Hit in the street by a truck, the child lies dying as John tries seems to fight the sights and sounds of the city that killed his daughter. Her death continues to haunt John as he relives the scene over and over at work. Eventually he loses his job and his wife, and he wanders around with nothing to live for. He reunites with Mary in the end and they attend a show, where on the program is an advertising slogan that he is responsible for. He rejoices in this achievement, and is then able to laugh at the show, joining the rest of the people in the crowd. It is a touching and realistic ending that Vidor called †Å"A perfectly natural finish for the story of Mr. Anyman† (Bergman 76). In the early 1930s Vidor wanted to take the trials and unrest of the common man and put it into a film, so he read as many articles as he could on the subject (Vidor 220). He came across an article by a college professor in Reader’s Digest that proposed the implementation of agricultural co-operatives as a solution to unemployment. Vidor used this concept to formulate his story with his wife, and the two of them began work on the script. They finished the story in four months, which they titled Our Daily Bread. It followed a trend of other â€Å"back to the earth† films that came out in 1933, such as King Kong, State Fair, The Life of Jimmy Dolan, and Stranger’s Return. With the script finished Vidor tried to sell the idea to Irving Thalberg at MGM, but although he expressed a liking for the story, he didn’t think it appropriate for MGM (Vidor 221). Vidor had no better luck with anyone else until he appealed to Charlie Chaplin, a co-owner of United Artists. UA agreed to release the picture, but Vidor still had to produce it himself. To get funding he hocked everything he could, raising about $125,000 to budget his film. With this money Vidor was able to make his film about an ideal social system, where people work together towards a common goal with a relationship based on trust to form a utopian community, showing the romantic idealist in Vidor (Welsh 446). Vidor wanted to take the same protagonists from The Crowd, John and Mary, and place them in Our Daily Bread so that he could move them out of the city and show them in a rural environment. Vidor wanted to offer an alternative lifestyle that involved getting away from the big cities and li ving off of the land. His conception of the agricultural co-operatives suggested a shifting away from industrialization and instead refocusing on the countries agricultural strengths to pull us out of the Depression. In Our Daily Bread, John and Mary begin in the city, both out of work. They get a break when a relative of Mary gives them the rights to an abandoned farm, so they back up what they can and leave the city for the country. However, their ignorance in agriculture has them turn to the help of others, an immigrant farmer and his family. They know how to farm and offer their services in exchange for being able to stay on the land with them. This starts a trend as they begin taking in out of work people that happen to pass by. The community that forms consists of people of all trades; there is even a criminal who serves as the commune’s cop. And they also take in trouble in the form of the town hussy, the platinum blonde Sally. .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 , .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .postImageUrl , .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 , .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4:hover , .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4:visited , .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4:active { border:0!important; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4:active , .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4 .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u82c70ee824f58c3ff9795282e874b7d4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Immorality In Television EssayWith the people in place the commune holds a campfire meeting to decide what direction they want their co-operative to head towards. John is willing to cede ownership of the land to the group. Much political rhetoric of a varied nature goes on, with ideas that swing from fascist to socialist to communist, but the group settles on having one strong leader in a democratic system, and that leader being John, despite his inexperience at farming. The commune runs into trouble when a drought hits and the corn crop is in danger. The commune must scrounge for food because they have no money to buy supplies. The criminal offers to give himself up to authorities so that the commune may collect on the $500 reward being offered for him, but the commune declines. The trouble that the commune has causes John to lose interest not only in the farm but also his wife as he becomes taken with Sally. When things seem darkest, John decides to run with Sally back to the city. However, shortly after leaving John gets a vision of an irrigation ditch they can build from a nearby stream that can save the crops. He turns around an presents his idea to the commune and they buy into it and set to work on digging it. The sequences were shot by Vidor as if it were a ballet (Vidor 224). The films end with the ditch being a success, with full and health crops in a very fantasy like endingIt is this lack of realism that makes Our Daily Bread an inferior film, especially as a follow up to The Crowd. The Crowd was a heart-wrenching look at the insanity of city life that showed how contentment could only be achieved by losing one’s sense of self. Our Daily Bread is an unrealistic solution to the Depression, which is also hindered by its poor acting and characters, in particular John, played by Tom Keene. The bad acting can perhaps be excused by the fact that Vidor hadn’t much of a budget to work with, but the character he presented in John was not a good example of a working class hero. John is weak and incompetent and it does not stand to reason that the co-operative would elect him as their leader. When things get tough John makes it his opportunity to run off with Sally. And it is not guilt of leaving his wife that brings him back, but his vision of an irrigation ditch that makes him turn back. His insight into the irrigation ditch is also a questionable plot mechanism. John is not the experienced farmer, but the immigrant who was first to arrive at the co-operative is. It is unreasonable to conceive that thousands of years of humans developing farming techniques would be lost on this poor Swede to where he would never come up with the concept of an aqueduct. This is one of several agricultural inaccuracies. The water they use in the end supposedly comes from a mountain stream. If this is true then mountain land is not fertile enough to grow corn and wheat, like what was being done in the co-operative. Also, it was suggested that the co-operative was growing their crops to sell, not just subsistence. During this time period there was a surplus of corn and wheat. There was no market for their crops. What makes this film particularly bad is how confused is seems ideologically at times. The campfire scene has moments were the film is very much leftist, then it swings to the right (Durgnat 149). John tries to give up ownership of the land to the co-operative, a left-wing act, but they feel it would be an ungrateful act, similar to an anti-welfare attitude. They also demand a strong leader and choose John, which he proudly accepts, also a right-wing attitude. There are other instances where there is a more leftist attitude, where people sacrifice for the good of the collective, which leans almost towards communism. The best example is when the criminal/cop turns himself in for the $500 reward to feed the commune. What best illustrated this confusion is the film’s winning second prize at a Soviet film festival in Moscow, yet didn’t receive first prize because they considered it to be â€Å"capitalist propaganda.† The Hearst press machine labeled the film â€Å"p inko†, and the Los Angeles Times refused an advertising layout because the film went too far to the left in their opinion (Vidor 227). .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 , .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .postImageUrl , .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 , .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841:hover , .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841:visited , .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841:active { border:0!important; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841:active , .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841 .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uac4197d88606a5f9ae10d146e2c07841:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Diabetes EssayWith the country in the midst of The Great Depression it is easy to see why the film was well received. The system that was currently in place was obviously not working. People wanted a solution to their problems. Vidor offered the means to a utopian society where people could work together towards a common goal, everyone doing equal share, everyone taking equal rewards. But his vision was unachievable. People out of work in the cities didn’t have relatives that owned farms and were willing to give them away. Cash crops were not bringing enough to earn a living. Vidor’s dream for pulling America out of the Depression was nothing more than what i t was: a dream. Bibliography:Works CitedBergman, Andrew. We’re in the Money: Depression America and its Films. New York:NYU Press, 1971. Durgnat, Raymond Simmon, Scott. King Vidor, American. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988. Vidor, King. A Tree is a Tree. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1952. Welsh, James M. â€Å"Vidor, King Wallis.† The Political Companion to American Film. Ed. Gary Crowdus. Lakeview Press, 1994.

Sunday, December 1, 2019

Loyola and Calvins Beliefs

Calvin believed that salvation of man is predetermined by God only. A human being does not receive salvation based on deeds or piousness. Calvin urged that even before God created the earth he had already elected people who would receive salvation. The people not elected can do nothing to escape the damnation (Robinson 1). On the contrary, Loyola believed that salvation required confession and atonement for sin. Salvation depends on one’s deeds. It can be achieved by practising the spiritual exercises for deliverance from sins.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Loyola and Calvin’s Beliefs specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Some were drawn to Calvin’s teaching because they felt it was comforting, as they did not have to do anything to earn salvation but hope that God had elected them. Thus, no need to work towards salvation as that is God’s choice (Clendenen and Waggoner 185). On the other hand, people were drawn to Loyola’s teachings because they did not feel hopeless about not having control of their future as they could choose salvation and go to heaven or decline and be damned (Matlak, Randall, McMullin and Royce 1). The beliefs by Loyola seem fair in that one had a free will to choose either to accept salvation or not. It shows that God is fair to all and gives them an equal chance to receive salvation. However, Calvin’s teaching leave me more confused because I cannot understand how God can create some people, elect them for damnation, and give them no chance to escape and give salvation to others for deliverance despite their deeds. Works Cited Clendenen, Ray and Brad Waggoner. Calvinism: A Southern Baptist Dialogue. Nashville, Tennessee: BH Publishing Group, 2008. Matlak, Gabby, Lisa Randall, Stockton McMullin and Pierre Royce. Ignatius of Loyola and the Society of Jesuits. n.d. Web. Robinson, Martha K. â€Å"Calvin, John.† In Mancall, Pet er C., and Gary B. Nash, eds. Encyclopedia of American History: Three Worlds Meet, Beginnings to 1607, Revised Edition (Volume I). New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010. American History Online. Web. This essay on Loyola and Calvin’s Beliefs was written and submitted by user Eliana U. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.